Case 9 of 20 · Logic & Reasoning
Pre-Mortem: Imagine Failure First
🔎 Case Brief #9
You're asked to mediate a disagreement between two groups who see preventing failure by imagining it very differently.
🎯 Your mission
Take the risk and try.
⚡ The twist
You can only use the clues you are given — no guessing.
What you'll learn · 1 of 4
Instead of a post-mortem (analyzing failure after), do a PRE-mortem: imagine your project has ALREADY FAILED.
What went wrong? This reveals risks you'd otherwise miss.
At this level, you're ready to move beyond surface-level thinking and engage with complexity. Real-world problems rarely have simple answers, and developing comfort with ambiguity is a crucial skill.
Here's a framework for approaching preventing failure by imagining it:
1. Frame the question precisely. Vague questions lead to vague answers.
What you'll learn · 2 of 4
Instead of "Is this good?" ask "What are the specific benefits and drawbacks, and for whom?"
2. Examine the evidence critically. Not all evidence is equal. Consider the source, the methodology, the sample size, and potential biases. Strong evidence comes from reliable sources with transparent methods.
3. Consider multiple perspectives. Every issue looks different from different viewpoints. Before forming your opinion, genuinely try to understand why someone might disagree with you.
What you'll learn · 3 of 4
This isn't about being wishy-washy — it's about being thorough.
4. Watch for thinking traps. Confirmation bias (only seeing evidence that supports your existing belief), anchoring (being overly influenced by the first piece of information), and false dichotomies (assuming there are only two options) can derail even careful thinkers.
5. Build your argument with structure.
What you'll learn · 4 of 4
A strong position has: a clear claim, supporting evidence, logical reasoning connecting the evidence to the claim, and honest acknowledgment of limitations or counterarguments.
6. Apply second-order thinking. Don't just ask "What happens next?" Ask "And then what happens after that?" Many unintended consequences become visible only when you think two or three steps ahead.
Use this framework as you work through the scenario and questions below.
Key idea: Preventing failure by imagining it
Think about this
You're asked to mediate a disagreement between two groups who see preventing failure by imagining it very differently. How would you help both sides understand each other while identifying the strongest elements of each position?
How a thinker does it
- 🔍
Frame the Question
Define the core question about preventing failure by imagining it precisely. What assumptions are built into how it's framed?
- 🧪
Assess Evidence
What evidence exists? Rate each piece as strong, moderate, or weak. Note gaps.
- 🧪
Generate Hypotheses
Develop at least 3 possible explanations or solutions. Include one unconventional option.
- ⚖️
Evaluate Systematically
Test each hypothesis against the evidence. What are the trade-offs? What are the risks?
- ⚖️
Think Ahead
If your conclusion is correct, what are the second-order effects? What implications follow?
- 🎯
State Your Position
Present your conclusion with confidence level (%), key reasons, and what could prove you wrong.
- 🪞
Metacognitive Check
What biases might have influenced you? Did you use the right thinking framework? What would you research further?
Words to know
- Correlation vs Causation
- Two things happening together (correlation) doesn't mean one causes the other (causation)
- Cognitive Bias
- A systematic pattern of thinking that deviates from rational judgment
- Syllogism
- A logical argument where a conclusion follows from two premises
- Modus Ponens
- If P implies Q, and P is true, then Q must be true
Solve the case · 1 of 3
Case 1
1 of 3What is the main idea of preventing failure by imagining it?
Solve the case · 2 of 3
Case 2
2 of 3How can you apply logic & reasoning in daily life?
Solve the case · 3 of 3
Case 3
3 of 3Good critical thinkers always:
Nice work!
You got 0 of 3 right.
Next Smart Case
We'll pick a case that matches exactly how well you're thinking right now.
✨ More to explore
🌍 Why this matters: Logical reasoning is the foundation of computer science, law, medicine, and scientific research. The ability to construct and evaluate arguments is valued in every career.
💬 Talk about it
- Find a current event that illustrates preventing failure by imagining it in action. What can we learn from it?
- What are the limitations of this thinking framework? When might it lead you astray?
- How would someone from a completely different background or culture approach this differently?
- Design a challenge or game that would help someone practice this skill.
🏆 Try this week: Find one real-world pattern in your house and write it down.
👨👩👧 At dinner: “What's the difference between 'feels true' and 'is true'?”
Challenge a friend
Can they solve this case? Share it on IG, TikTok, or WhatsApp.
Ready?
Pre-Mortem: Imagine Failure First
Take the risk and try.
Full screen — no distractions
