Today is rung 2 of 6 on this topic
Causes and consequences in history
Can do: Explains an event with multiple causes and distinguishes short-term triggers from long-term causes.
Why it matters
Single-cause history is the version that gets remembered and misused. Multi-causal thinking is the actual historical skill.
What it looks like when it's wobbly
Gives one cause and treats it as the whole explanation.
⏱️ Two-minute check
Take any event they've studied. "Give me three causes. Which mattered most, and why?"
Solid looks like: Three genuine causes and a ranked judgement.
The full activity for this topic · 20 minutes
Cause Ladder
- 1Write the event in the middle of the page.
- 2Brainstorm causes on sticky notes — one per note, aim for at least five.
- 3Sort them into long-term background and short-term triggers.
- 4Rank them and argue for the top one. Disagreeing with them is useful here.
- 5Do the same on the other side for consequences, immediate and long-term.
If it's too hard
Three causes, no ranking.
If it's too easy
Argue the counterfactual: if the top cause hadn't happened, would the event still have?
Say this
"That's one cause. What else was already true, long before it happened?"